Camus creates a part one and a part two in order to highlight the difference in Meursault. In part one, Meursault is very internal. He does not express his ideas or opinions and simply sits, watches and comes to conclusions. He does not try to intervene in the course of his life or others' lives. This is perfectly portrayed when early in the book, Meursault sits and watches all that is going on around him. This passive side to Meursault is contrasted when Camus places the involved and spirited Meursault in part two. In the second part of the book, Meursault's actions and thoughts show a more caring and active person. This is shown through Meursault's reaction to the Chaplain's efforts to convert Meursault. This contrast is put in place in order to show how decisions effect a person's personality. When Meursault kills the Arab at the very end of part one, it changes Meursault's character because it shows him taking an active role in his life and the lives of those around him. This is what causes the change of personality in Meursault between part one and part two. Camus uses the juxtaposition to show how someones involvement in their own life changes who they are has a person and their personality.
Your thesis is on the right track but it is still to broad. I think we have covered that things change from part one to part two. Dig in there. What new insights can you contribute. When you say "humans change" and "environment change" you should narrow down how.
ReplyDelete